News Summary

• After years of disappointing results, multiple firms now claim that software can reliably distinguish between AI-written and human-written text.
• One in eight biomedical articles last year contained some AI-generated text according to Pangram, a study reported in January 1.
• In June, the premier computer-science conference NeurIPS announced that it rejected 18% of submissions after screening them with Pangrams.
• The University of Chicago in Illinois says that it has started using it to vet students’ coursework.