Opinion The Supreme Court should deal in facts, not hypotheticals
News Source : Financial Post
News Summary
- Judges are supposed to decide on the basis of the facts before them.
- Increasingly, they're asking what should happen in various what-ifs.
- Hypotheticals involve imagining edge cases that have never arisen.
- This makes it easier to strike down laws in principle rather than to assess how they function in practice.
- A better approach would be to consult a detailed U.S. federal sentencing guidelines.
- In the U.K., judges have developed informal “sentencing ranges’
In its recent Senneville decision, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) split five to four on the appropriateness of the sentences of two offenders for accessing and possessing child pornography. Most C [+5268 chars]
Never miss a story from us, subscribe to our newsletter